Steadfast Loyalty
    • Home
    • Opportunities
    • Home Wellness
    • Government Gone Wild
    • National Security
    • Social Issues
    • Veterans/Military
    Steadfast Loyalty
    Home»Conservatives»Dershowitz: The President did not obstruct justice in firing James Comey
    Conservatives

    Dershowitz: The President did not obstruct justice in firing James Comey

    By Ashley CantonMay 13, 2017Updated:May 16, 20172 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

    When Alan Dershowitz says that President Trump was perfectly legal to fire FBI Director James Comey, you can take it to the bank. Alan Dershowitz is an American lawyer, jurist, author, and a prominent scholar on United States constitutional law and criminal law. He is a leading defender of civil liberties. This flies right in the face of all they posturing by the Democrats and their mainstream media minion. Read it all here.

    As Written by Alan Dershowitz, contributor for the Washington Examiner:

    A dangerous argument is now being put forward by some Democratic ideologues: namely that President Trump should be indicted for the crime of obstructing justice because he fired FBI Director James Comey. Whatever one may think of the president’s decision to fire Comey as a matter of policy, there is no legitimate basis for concluding that the president engaged in a crime by exercising his statutory and constitutional authority to fire director Comey. As Comey himself wrote in his letter to the FBI, no one should doubt the authority of the president to fire the director for any reason or no reason.

    It should not be a crime for a public official, whether the president or anyone else, to exercise his or her statutory and constitutional authority to hire or fire another public official. For something to be a crime there must be both an actus reus and mens rea – that is, a criminal act accompanied by a criminal state of mind.

    Even assuming that Trump was improperly motivated in firing Comey, motive alone should never constitute a crime. There should have to be an unlawful act. And exercising constitutional and statutory power should not constitute the actus reus of a crime. Otherwise the crime would place the defendant’s thoughts on trial, rather than his actions.

    Civil libertarians, and all who care about due process and justice, should be concerned about the broad scope of the statute that criminalizes…….

    KEEP READING HERE:

    Alan Dershowitz: Trump did not obstruct justice in firing James Comey

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email

    Related Posts

    China And Brazil Reach Deal To Ditch US Dollar For Trade

    March 30, 2023

    Minneapolis City Council To Discuss Floyd Lawsuit Settlement

    March 30, 2023

    Garland ‘More Than Willing’ To Appear Before Judiciary Committee

    March 30, 2023
    Top Posts

    Understanding EBT Cards

    March 30, 2023

    718% Profit Surge For Egg Companies As Prices Soar To New Levels

    March 30, 2023

    China And Brazil Reach Deal To Ditch US Dollar For Trade

    March 30, 2023

    Washington DC Denies Crime Crises Despite Increase

    March 30, 2023
    Our Picks

    Washington DC Denies Crime Crises Despite Increase

    March 30, 2023

    Minneapolis City Council To Discuss Floyd Lawsuit Settlement

    March 30, 2023

    Garland ‘More Than Willing’ To Appear Before Judiciary Committee

    March 30, 2023
    Most Popular

    ‘Trans Day Of Vengeance’ Set To Proceed

    March 30, 2023

    One Angry Travelor Resuses To Swap Air Plane Seats With Mom

    March 29, 2023

    Secretary of Defense On Afghanistan Withdrawal: ‘Zero Regret’

    March 29, 2023
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    • Corrections Policy
    Steadfast Loyalty © 2023. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.