On Tuesday, Elon Musk, the CEO of Twitter, said that he had been the victim of a “planned attempt” by many prominent Democrats. Rather than being “directors or script writers,” he said, they are “actors on the political stage.”
Musk hit back at a piece that said he became involved in politics out of anger in response to Democrats’ criticism.
Before “Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren started criticizing him for no reason,” Elon “wasn’t highly political on Twitter,” the account said. Others eventually joined them after waiting for a while. They voted for the person they thought would have been most effective at resolving problems with the government.
The most influential Democrats weren’t just attacking me; they attacked others as well. We have it all mapped out, “The billionaire Elon Musk commented. Outside of party leadership and independents like [West Virginia Senator Joe] Manchin, “they are simply players on the stage, not directors or script writers” in politics.
The current president has branded Musk a “bulls**t artist,” and Democrats have been hostile to him for various reasons during the last four years.
Two years ago, when federal offices throughout the country went into lockdown, Musk ignited a political awakening. Tesla’s founder snapped after California officials repeatedly prevented the reopening of a necessary facility, and he eventually moved the company’s headquarters to Texas. As the left was “losing the middle” in politics, he advised his fellow Americans to “take the red pill.”
Senator Ed Markey’s (D) fellow Democrats have expressed skepticism about his intention to purchase Twitter. Given that he signed the letter, anyone may pose as him on the internet.
Yesterday, a reporter for the Washington Post created a fake Twitter account in my name, paid a nominal fee to have the story “verified,” and falsely claimed that the account belonged to me, a sitting senator from the United States. With the first words of his letter, “That’s not the case,” Markey promptly ended the rumors. Because Twitter has to make money, it has sloppy verification procedures that allow anyone with $8 and a willingness to mimic someone to accomplish it. Selling the truth is not just unethical but may have severe repercussions. Twitter must explain what occurred and detail how they will prevent a repeat.
Finally, Markey presented a badge of legitimacy for the fake account.
Unfortunately, I received a pop-up message telling me that the fake account had been verified not because someone had paid for the verification blue checkmark, as Markey had falsely claimed, but because I was a prominent government person. Twitter users have historically benefited from the blue checkmark as critical information consumers.
It was reported in the Washington Post that Markey had nothing to do with the hoax. Badges opened in the respective windows of the screenshots of his genuine and fake Twitter profiles.
His profile noted, “This account is verified because of its significance in government, news, entertainment, or another recognized sector.”
To quote Markey, “This account is verified since it is subscribed to Twitter Blue.” was what the fake account should have said to make it appear legitimate.
Sen. Markey called Twitter “the Wild West of social media” because he was concerned about the authentication procedure, which the company had temporarily removed for Twitter Blue users.
During Markey’s tweet to Musk, Musk immediately responded.
I want explanations from @elonmusk on why he puts paying off his debt and making a profit ahead of fighting misinformation, “A tweet from Markey. A reporter for the @washingtonpost created a verified account in my likeness. What happened, and more importantly, how it may be avoided in the future, has to be explained by Twitter.
Maybe because your story reads like a bad joke, Tesla’s CEO, Elon Musk, has spoken out.
Musk tweeted after the incident, “And why does your pp have a mask!” about the senator’s disguise.