Leonel Moreno, a Venezuelan migrant and self-proclaimed “migrant influencer,” has sparked controversy through a series of online videos where he flaunts his financial status while deriding American taxpayers and fellow migrants who engage in manual labor in the U.S. Moreno, who has faced a ban on TikTok, shifted his attention to Instagram, where he posted multiple clips showcasing large sums of money, boasting about his lack of need for traditional employment. In his statements, Moreno expressed a sentiment of superiority over those who “work like slaves,” claiming his journey to the U.S. was not to labor but to “mark [his] territory” and seek financial success through minimal effort.
His provocative content has not only drawn criticism for its disparaging remarks towards hardworking individuals but also for encouraging illegal immigrants to exploit squatter laws to occupy vacant homes in the United States. Moreno’s online persona has been a blend of braggadocio and advice, suggesting that migrants can live comfortably on government assistance and earnings from social media platforms, despite his TikTok account’s suspension. His assertions of making a living without working, coupled with a display of cash and a carefree lifestyle, have fueled debates on immigration, social media influence, and the ethics of exploiting public resources.
Moreno’s actions and words have led to his designation as an “absconder” by immigration authorities after he allegedly removed his ankle monitor. His case highlights broader issues surrounding immigration enforcement and the challenges of managing individuals who enter the U.S. under various pretenses, only to flout the laws and regulations in place. As Moreno continues to leverage social media to spread his controversial messages, the response from the public and authorities underscores the complexities of immigration policy, social welfare, and the responsibility of influencers in shaping public discourse.