Republicans for Texas Attorney General State law prohibits the acquisition of biometric data without a specific agreement, and Ken Paxton sued Google last Thursday, saying the firm had breached this rule.
In 2009, the state of Texas passed the Capture or Utilization of Biometric Identifier Act, which made it illegal for private businesses to utilize biometric identifiers without the agreement of the individual. Data such as fingerprints, iris scans, voiceprints, and face geometry are also included. In the District Court of Midland County, Texas, a complaint has been filed claiming that Google has been collecting this information in “blatant disobedience” of the law since at least 2015.
Paxton made it clear that he would not tolerate Google’s “indiscriminate gathering of personal information of Texans, especially particularly sensitive information like biometric identifiers.”
According to the lawsuit, Google “trains” its facial recognition algorithm by studying uploaded photographs, even those of innocent bystanders, in order to improve its ability to “scan and analyze faces.” Google’s business offerings benefit from this enhancement. Voiceprints are used in a similar fashion by Google Assistant to presumably enhance the accuracy of speech recognition.
The complaint argues that “many Texans do not comprehend that their contributions entail placing up for inspection two of the most distinctive personal features any anybody has to call their own” in order to contribute to the Internet giant’s financial success. Recent statements have made it evident that commercializing Texans’ biometric IDs on a large scale is invasive and perhaps dangerous.
In January, Paxton filed a lawsuit against Meta (previously Facebook), alleging that it had illegally held the biometric data of millions of users and non-users. After a $650 million class action settlement was struck in 2018 for alleged violations of Illinois privacy law, facial recognition was disabled on Facebook.
There have been investigations by lawmakers into other internet companies on suspicion of illegally gathering customer data. When there is an “imminent threat of death or significant physical harm,” Amazon vendor Ring revealed in January that it had given law police access to user device footage.
The lawmaker used this policy as a rationale for proposing the Facial Recognition and Biometric Technology Moratorium Act, which would prohibit the collection of biometric information by any branch of government. As my ongoing investigation into Amazon demonstrates, it is becoming increasingly hard for Americans to move, congregate, and converse in public without being observed and recorded,” Senator Edward J. Markey stated in a statement. The United States must reject any prospect that this may occur.
According to Forbes, the Chinese company ByteDance, which operates the viral video platform TikTok, planned to track the movements of its American users. The internal audit and risk department of ByteDance, which was supposed to investigate claims of misconduct by current and former employees, allegedly instead set out to locate a U.S. citizen who had never worked for the company.
Earlier this year, TheWrap discovered that TikTok lets ByteDance and others access user data by going beyond Apple’s and Google’s privacy limitations.