So the New York Times has issued a "correction" this week about an article that incorrectly claimed all 17 United States Intelligence agencies agreed that "Russia orchestrated the attacks and that it did it to help get [Trump] elected".
Of course they did, lol.. look at the hellfire CNN is now caught in thanks to their constant pushing of a false narrative... one that they KNEW was false and did so anyway all for the ratings.
Given these recent revalations about President Trump and more and more of the media that once opposed him coming forward and stating good things about the man, I bet we'll continue to see this growing trend.
Maybe now a few more folks will be more willing to give the man a chance to run this country instead of always playing interference. It's like Tom Hanks said... “This is the United States of America. We’ll go on. There’s great like-minded people out there who are Americans first and Republicans or Democrats second,” he continued “I hope the president-elect does such a great job that I vote for his re-election in four years.”
No matter what side of the isle you stand on, we should all want this!
As written for The Daily Caller by Holmes Lybrand:
The original article, published June 25, covered certain reactions that President Donald Trump gave in response to Russian cyber attacks and interactions with the 2016 presidential election.
TheNYT’s correction notes that: “The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.”
Former candidate Hillary Clinton made the claim in late May that all 17 intelligence agencies agreed “that the Russians ran an extensive information war against my campaign to influence voters in the election.”
NYT Corrects Story Claiming 17 Intel Agencies ‘Agree’ On Russia