Allegations have surfaced that a tight group of former President Joe Biden’s longtime advisers and family members wielded behind-the-scenes control over major White House decisions during his administration, fueling questions about transparency and his cognitive health.
Reports suggest this influential inner circle, made up of trusted aides and relatives, operated as a de facto leadership team—shaping policy, controlling messaging, and managing access to the President. Key figures in the group allegedly included senior strategists, longtime political allies, and close family members.
As concerns about Biden’s mental sharpness grew, this team is said to have worked deliberately to shield him from unscripted public appearances and carefully controlled the flow of information within the administration. Their efforts reportedly focused on preserving his public image and avoiding moments that could reveal signs of decline.
Critics argue that entrusting unelected advisers with such influence compromised public accountability and weakened checks within the executive branch. By sidelining cabinet-level voices and centralizing decision-making power, they contend, the structure risked undermining the integrity of democratic governance.
The claims have reignited broader debates over how presidential power is exercised and overseen, especially when questions arise about a leader’s fitness for office. As political momentum continues to shift post-2024, scrutiny intensifies over who truly held the reins during Biden’s final years in office.