Surprising observers of the case, Judge Aileen Cannon has set a preliminary trial date of August 14 for former President Donald Trump’s handling of documents. However, legal experts speculate that this timeline is unlikely to hold, and they anticipate delays that could extend the trial well beyond the November 2024 presidential election, potentially benefiting Trump.
Former federal prosecutor Brandon Van Grack expressed skepticism about the trial date, citing the extensive process involved in handling classified information before a trial. He remarked that it is improbable for the trial to conclude before the 2024 election, raising the possibility that Trump, if reelected, could explore options such as self-pardon or directing the attorney general to drop the charges.
The potential for a delayed trial has drawn attention to the strategic advantages it may provide to Trump. If the trial extends beyond November 2024 and Trump secures another presidential victory, he could potentially appoint sympathetic officials to the Justice Department before the case concludes or consider pardoning himself if convicted, as reported by Axios.
Legal expert Andrew McCarthy, speaking on a National Review podcast, expressed doubts about the trial commencing before the November election. He highlighted the complexities of the government rules concerning classified information and the time-consuming nature of the procedures, which defendants often exploit to their advantage.
The Washington Post has shed light on the tactical advantage Trump’s legal team could gain through the rules governing classified information. Lawyers familiar with such cases consider the procedures to be time-consuming and challenging, providing ample opportunities for a defendant to delay a trial.
In response to the impending trial, Trump’s legal team is expected to employ various tactics, filing numerous motions and challenges to further postpone the proceedings. Additionally, the process of obtaining security clearances for Trump’s lawyers adds another layer of delay, as it typically takes several months to complete.
The uncertain and protracted timeline surrounding the trial raises questions about its ultimate outcome and whether it will ever come to fruition given the potential for delays and the influence of future political developments.