Steadfast Loyalty
    • Home
    • Opportunities
    • Home Wellness
    • Government Gone Wild
    • National Security
    • Social Issues
    • Veterans/Military
    Steadfast Loyalty
    Home»Healthcare»U.S. District Court Judge to rule next week on the Obamacare subsidies fight
    Healthcare

    U.S. District Court Judge to rule next week on the Obamacare subsidies fight

    By Steadfast Admin2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

    U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria plans to give a ruling next week regarding a request that would force the White House to make Obamacare subsidy payments as it plans to cut off beginning with a payment just this week.

    As reported by Josh Gerstein for Politico:

    A group of 19 states filed suit last week in federal court in San Francisco, asking that the Department of Health and Human Services be required to continue the so-called cost-sharing reduction payments despite President Donald Trump’s announcement last week that they would be ended.

    During a telephone scheduling hearing on the states’ request for a temporary restraining order requiring the government to continue the payments, U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria said he’d like to rule on that issue next week.

    A lawyer for the states, Greg Brown, said the issue is urgent because failing to make the payments to insurance companies on time will disrupt the insurance markets.

    “It injects a large amount of chaos into the health care system” and the Affordable Care Act, said Brown, a California deputy solicitor general, after Chhabria asked what harm would arise from a two-week delay.

    “The chaos and disruption is going to potentially cause insurers to raise their rates and potentially drop out of certain markets,” Brown said, noting that the open-enrollment period for Obamacare begins Nov. 1. “Even a two-week delay would, we believe, cause fewer people to be insured.”

    A federal government lawyer, James Burnham of the Department of Justice, noted that the law doesn’t actually require that the payments be made on any specific schedule, but simply that they be “periodic and timely.”

    Even if the judge ordered the payments to continue, “the government would still have discretion about when to make the payments — it could be quarterly, it could be biannually,” Burnham said.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email

    Related Posts

    Pete Davidson Checks into Rehab for Mental Health Support

    June 30, 2023

    CDC Director Rochelle Walensky To Step Down Next Month

    May 5, 2023

    Senator John Fetterman Puts The Blame On Dr. Oz For Depression

    May 4, 2023
    Top Posts

    Navigating the Realm of Online Dating Asian Women

    March 3, 2026

    Clinton Says Trump Gave No Hint of Epstein Ties

    February 27, 2026

    Biden Makes Rare Campaign Stop After Cancer Diagnosis

    February 27, 2026

    Tlaib Sparks Backlash During SOTU Protest

    February 27, 2026
    Our Picks

    Tlaib Sparks Backlash During SOTU Protest

    February 27, 2026

    Mangione Avoids Federal Death Penalty

    February 27, 2026

    Fresh U.S.-Iran Talks Begin in Geneva

    February 27, 2026
    Most Popular

    Trump Frustrated With Iran Talks, Keeps Strike Option Open

    February 27, 2026

    Clinton Slams Probe Before Epstein Testimony

    February 27, 2026

    Clinton Says He Didn’t Know Woman in Hot Tub Photo

    February 27, 2026
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    • Corrections Policy
    Steadfast Loyalty © 2026. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.