Steadfast Loyalty
    • Home
    • Opportunities
    • Home Wellness
    • Government Gone Wild
    • National Security
    • Social Issues
    • Veterans/Military
    Steadfast Loyalty
    Home»Unreal»Actual Devil Worshipers Go To Court Claiming Abortion Laws Violet Their Rights
    Unreal

    Actual Devil Worshipers Go To Court Claiming Abortion Laws Violet Their Rights

    By Steadfast AdminJanuary 24, 2018Updated:January 24, 20182 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

    A member of The Satanic Temple are taking their case up against the Missouri Supreme Court after a member they’ll only refer to as “Mary Doe” claims that the states stance on abortion, part of which requires a 72-hour waiting period, violates hers and their religious freedom.

    “Mary Doe” claims that in May 2015 before her abortion that she was “forced” to see an ultrasound of her baby and even required to read a booklet called “begins at conception.”

    This was “forced upon her” despite the fact that she “adheres to principles of the Satanic temple and has sincerely held religious beliefs different from the information in the informed consent booklet,” according to her case summary.

    “Specifically, her letter advised she has deeply held religious beliefs that a nonviable fetus is not a separate human being but is part of her body and that abortion of a nonviable fetus does not terminate the life of a separate, unique, living human being,” the case summary stated according to NBC News.

    Jex Blackmore (yeah I’m sure that’s his real name…), a spokesperson for the “church” says that Mary Doe’s religious freedoms are being trampled on.

    “The State has essentially established a religious indoctrination program intended to push a single ideological viewpoint,” Blackmore said in a statement. “The law is intended to punish women who disagree with this opinion.”

    “Missouri’s state-mandated informed consent booklets explicitly say that life begins at conception, which is a nonmedical religious viewpoint that many people disagree with,” his statement continued. “Forcing women to read this information and then wait 72-hours to consider the State’s opinion is a clear violation of the Establishment Clause.”

    While the state disagreed with the “church” and their assessment, an appeals court in Missouri found merit in their argument. They’ve agree to let the case go to the Missouri Supreme Court and even say it’s an urgent case of constitutional implications.

    “Neither the Missouri Supreme Court nor the U.S. Supreme Court has considered whether a Booklet of this nature, an Ultrasound, an Audible Heartbeat Offer, and a seventy-two-hour Waiting Period violate the Religion Clause rights of pregnant women,” Missouri Supreme Court Judge Thomas Newton wrote. “Because we believe that this case raises real and substantial constitutional claims, it is within the Missouri Supreme Court’s exclusive jurisdiction.”

    I’m all for religious freedom but THIS?! COME ON!

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email

    Related Posts

    Man Who Stabbed Police Officer With Screwdriver Pays a Heavy Price [VIDEO]

    February 15, 2020

    CONFIRMED: Robert Mueller Committed Obstruction of Justice By Destroying Evidence

    August 3, 2019

    Kazakhstan National and Migrant to US Captured in Syria as Top ISIS Sniper

    July 21, 2019
    Top Posts

    “Dawson Creek” Star Furious At Democrats For Refusing Biden To Debate

    June 1, 2023

    Jordan Neely’s Uncle Gets Arrested Again Before Court Hearing

    June 1, 2023

    Reporter’s “Corrupt” Biden Question Leaves WH Official Speechless

    May 31, 2023

    Ron DeSantis Destroys Trump’s Florida Criticism

    May 31, 2023
    Our Picks

    Ron DeSantis Destroys Trump’s Florida Criticism

    May 31, 2023

    ESPN’s Bold Move: Trans Flag at Campus

    May 31, 2023

    Unlikely Figure Assisting DeSantis on ‘Book Ban’

    May 31, 2023
    Most Popular

    FBI Director Wray Makes New Confession About ‘Biden Bribery Scheme’

    May 31, 2023

    Trump Slammed For Attacking Kayleigh ‘Milktoast’ McEnany

    May 31, 2023

    That ’70s Show’ Star Danny Masterson Found Guilty In Rape Retrial

    May 31, 2023
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    • Corrections Policy
    Steadfast Loyalty © 2023. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.