The University of Pennsylvania is reportedly considering the resignation of its president, Liz Magill, amid increasing controversy following her testimony before Congress on antisemitism. Magill’s comments during the hearing have sparked significant backlash, leading to heightened scrutiny and calls for her to step down.
The university’s board of trustees, chaired by Scott Bok, convened an emergency meeting to address the situation. Sources indicate that Bok is expected to discuss Magill’s potential resignation. This development has been met with reactions from various quarters, including Bill Ackman, a billionaire hedge fund manager, who expressed support for the move, signaling a positive turn for the university.
Despite these developments, a spokesperson for the University of Pennsylvania stated that there are currently no definitive plans to replace Magill. This statement comes amidst growing calls for leadership change from influential figures, including major donors and Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro.
Shapiro, who is Jewish, described Magill’s congressional testimony as “shameful,” emphasizing the need for leaders to demonstrate moral clarity. He urged the university’s board to assess whether Magill’s statements align with the institution’s values.
Additionally, the board of Penn’s Wharton Business School has directly appealed to Magill, requesting her resignation. Prominent figures on the board, such as Ronald Perelman, Ken Moelis, and Josh Harris, have voiced their concerns about the university’s direction under its current leadership.
Former US Ambassador Jon Huntsman, representing a family with significant contributions to the university, also advocated for Magill’s removal, calling for renewed brilliance at the institution.
Compounding the pressure, Ross Stevens, head of Stone Ridge Asset Management, threatened to retract a substantial $100 million donation unless the university takes decisive action against Magill. His firm has already communicated this stance to the university through legal channels.
In response to the criticism, Magill released an apology video, acknowledging the gravity of her comments and clarifying her stance on genocide as “evil, plain and simple.” However, she also mentioned the challenge of balancing university policies and constitutional rights regarding freedom of speech.
The situation remains dynamic, with the university community and external stakeholders closely watching for any further developments regarding Magill’s position and the broader implications for the institution.