The list of those being punishment for expressing controversial thoughts on social media is constantly growing.
In a shocking turn of events, NASCAR has suspended driver Noah Gragson for supporting an offensive image on George Floyd, an African-American man whose untimely death in a police encounter in 2020 sparked global unrest.
This cycle, which is now ingrained in the “New Normal,” exemplifies how some ideas, no matter how cruel or politically unpalatable, may do permanent harm to one’s career. The notorious fall of Justine Sacco in 2013 as a result of a darkly hilarious tweet is remembered as a turning point in contemporary culture.
Elon Musk is ready to defy this expectation, though.
The CEO of X (previously Twitter) has vowed to defend anyone who are wrongfully penalized for their online views.
We will pay for your legal fees if you have experienced unfair treatment from your employment as a result of a post or like on our platform, Musk promised. “No restrictions. Notify us, and we’ll target corporate boards in addition to merely litigating on your behalf.
Although Musk is at the top of the global wealth hierarchy, his dedication may nevertheless have a cost. The consequences of their online contacts have harmed many others, and the incidents we are aware of are probably only the top of the iceberg.
A well-known person affected by the prevalent social media culture immediately added their two cents.
On August 6, 2023, Gina Carano tweeted, “I think I fit the bill.”
She is entirely correct.
Even the largely liberal movie website MovieWeb agreed with this statement.
Carano, the star of “Terror on the Prairie,” was threatened with dismissal from Disney+’s “The Mandalorian” after taking social media positions that were at odds with those of her enlightened bosses. She questioned pandemic lockdown procedures, humorously criticized the use of current pronouns, and memorably compared elements of contemporary life to those in 1930s Germany.
Not by Nazi soldiers, but by their neighbors—even by children—were Jews assaulted in the streets. Most people today are unaware of this due to the editing of history, but in order for Nazi forces to be able to pick up thousands of Jews with ease, the government had to first make their own neighbors despise them for being Jews. What distinguishes it from detesting someone for their political beliefs?
Interestingly, but in a more caustic way, her co-star Pedro Pascal also made identical Nazi analogies on social media. Disney fired Carano, but he kept his job (leading to a job offer from The Daily Wire).
It’s remarkable that many people who publish vile or ominous statements frequently avoid consequences from their jobs.
Why?
These messages are frequently delivered by liberal speakers. The previous Twitter administrators made it plain that they were biased in favor of left-leaning ideas while punishing individuals who had right-leaning views.
The Twitter Files attest to this fact.
Today’s social media platforms all clearly lean to the left, as seen by the differences between the viewpoints they support and those they criticize.
The targeted person’s political identity is another factor at play, with conservatives frequently taking the biggest hit. This explains why despite her history of harsh, irrational Twitter insults with GOP Sen. Rand Paul, Bette Midler was not affected by Disney+.
Although admirable, Musk’s commitment could be difficult to keep.
Given his enigmatic public demeanor, his engagement could lean toward high-profile cases or pivot to other initiatives.
Even Musk’s impressive capabilities might not be enough to win this struggle.
Even though a legal victory is still unlikely, starting with Carano’s unfair dismissal might be a wise move. This incident serves as a reminder of the decision-making procedure used by Disney and the underlying considerations, maybe preventing more dismissals of the same nature. Musk and society as a whole would both benefit from such a result.