Steadfast Loyalty
    • Home
    • Opportunities
    • Home Wellness
    • Government Gone Wild
    • National Security
    • Social Issues
    • Veterans/Military
    Steadfast Loyalty
    Home»News»NY AG Trolls Trump About Interest Owed on Judgment
    News

    NY AG Trolls Trump About Interest Owed on Judgment

    By Steadfast Admin2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

    New York Attorney General Letitia James has taken to social media to publicly highlight the escalating interest payments owed by former President Donald Trump on a substantial civil fraud judgment. Following a Manhattan Supreme Court decision that found Trump guilty of inflating his wealth to secure financial advantages, he was ordered to pay a $355 million fine, accompanied by a 9% annual interest rate.

    The judgment, stemming from accusations of deceitful practices to expand his real estate empire, has seen James actively updating the public on the growing amount Trump owes, which, with interest, has escalated significantly since the ruling. As of her latest update, the total amount, including Trump’s co-defendants, reached approximately $464.8 million.

    James’s commentary on X (formerly Twitter) appears to serve as a reminder of the financial consequences of the judgment against Trump and his associates. The Attorney General’s office had previously clarified that the combined figure owed had increased to $450 million at the time of the ruling, with interest contributing to the rising total.

    In response to the ruling, Trump’s legal team has initiated an appeal, contesting the decision they’ve labeled as “egregious” and challenging the imposed ban on Trump doing business in New York for three years. Despite the appeal, the fine remains payable, a point James has emphasized by indicating her readiness to pursue Trump’s assets, including his valuable properties in New York, should he fail to comply with the payment.

    This legal battle has intensified the longstanding feud between Trump and James, with Trump accusing the Attorney General of conducting a political “witch hunt” against him. Trump has criticized the verdict as “election interference” and an abuse of the justice system for political ends. James, however, has refuted claims of personal animosity towards Trump, framing her actions as part of her official duties.

    As the appeal process unfolds, the public discourse around the case continues to reflect the deeply polarized views on accountability, justice, and political rivalry in today’s America.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email

    Related Posts

    Clinton Says Trump Gave No Hint of Epstein Ties

    February 27, 2026

    Biden Makes Rare Campaign Stop After Cancer Diagnosis

    February 27, 2026

    Tlaib Sparks Backlash During SOTU Protest

    February 27, 2026
    Top Posts

    Navigating the Realm of Online Dating Asian Women

    March 3, 2026

    Clinton Says Trump Gave No Hint of Epstein Ties

    February 27, 2026

    Biden Makes Rare Campaign Stop After Cancer Diagnosis

    February 27, 2026

    Tlaib Sparks Backlash During SOTU Protest

    February 27, 2026
    Our Picks

    Tlaib Sparks Backlash During SOTU Protest

    February 27, 2026

    Mangione Avoids Federal Death Penalty

    February 27, 2026

    Fresh U.S.-Iran Talks Begin in Geneva

    February 27, 2026
    Most Popular

    Trump Frustrated With Iran Talks, Keeps Strike Option Open

    February 27, 2026

    Clinton Slams Probe Before Epstein Testimony

    February 27, 2026

    Clinton Says He Didn’t Know Woman in Hot Tub Photo

    February 27, 2026
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    • Corrections Policy
    Steadfast Loyalty © 2026. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.