A Pentagon advisory group working closely with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is facing growing scrutiny as questions emerge about how much influence the team has exercised over U.S. wartime decision-making.
According to the report, several longtime military strategists and policy aides have taken on an unusually active role in shaping battlefield directives and shaping high-level recommendations. Their expanded presence inside key planning discussions has prompted debate among current and former defense officials about whether their involvement has blurred traditional lines of authority.
Critics argue that the advisory circle has inserted itself too deeply into operational matters typically reserved for senior uniformed leadership. Some officials expressed concern that this dynamic could complicate command structures during a period of heightened global tensions.
Supporters of the group say the advisers bring valuable experience and help ensure the Secretary receives diverse perspectives before issuing directives. They stress that no decisions are made outside established Pentagon protocols.
The development comes as the Defense Department faces increased political and public attention over recent military actions, raising questions about transparency, adherence to chain-of-command norms, and the proper role of civilian advisers during active conflicts.