In a thought-provoking discussion on CNN, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez shared her unique perspective on the checks and balances within the U.S. Supreme Court, suggesting that despite their existence, there is an apparent lack of restraint on the Court’s power.
During the interview with host Dana Bash, Ocasio-Cortez addressed President Joe Biden’s recent comments opposing the expansion of the Court, emphasizing her belief that the power of justices should be limited, even though no federal official possesses unlimited power.
Highlighting her concerns, she expressed, “If the courts were to operate without any checks or balances, we would witness a worrisome and potentially dangerous authoritarian expansion of power within the Supreme Court. This is evident in recent rulings, from the erosion of abortion rights to decisions that undermine the personhood and dignity of LGBTQ individuals in our nation.”
According to Ocasio-Cortez, such rulings signify a troubling drift toward authoritarianism and the concentration of power within the Court. She pointed out that even members of the Court, like Justice Elena Kagan, have acknowledged the risk of the Court assuming the role of a legislature.
While acknowledging the historical significance of checks and balances, Ocasio-Cortez urged for greater scrutiny of the Court’s power. She emphasized that current circumstances necessitate a reevaluation of the Court’s authority and the potential implications for democratic governance.
The discussion also touched upon the topic of expanding the Court, prompting further exploration of the delicate balance between preserving the integrity of the judiciary and addressing the need for accountability and oversight.
As the conversation unfolded, Ocasio-Cortez made a compelling case for the importance of maintaining a robust system of checks and balances to safeguard against the potential encroachment of unchecked power within the Supreme Court.