The federal government’s border czar, Tom Homan, has declined to defend South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem on immigration policy, acknowledging publicly that the two remain at odds over how best to address challenges at the U.S. border.
In recent remarks, Homan said he and Noem share the goal of strengthening border security but disagreed on specific strategies and priorities. He emphasized that while respectful of her views, he does not endorse all of her proposals and has not shifted his own policy positions to align with hers.
Noem has been a vocal advocate for tough border measures, calling for stronger enforcement and expanded powers for state and local authorities to intervene in immigration matters. Homan, who was appointed to oversee implementation of the administration’s border initiatives, stressed that he reports to federal leadership and bases his assessments on guidance from that chain of command.
The disagreement highlights continuing debate within conservative and Republican circles over the best approach to border security and immigration control, even among leaders who broadly favor stricter measures. Homan reiterated his commitment to federal policy goals while making it clear that he and Noem have not closed their policy gap.
The exchange comes amid increasing national focus on border conditions and legislative standoffs over immigration funding and enforcement strategy in Washington. Both figures continue to shape public discussion, even as their perspectives diverge on key points of operational policy.