Hunter Biden recently testified about his laptop during a deposition related to a defamation lawsuit. In the deposition, he expressed embarrassment about the “offensive” content published from the laptop but continued to deny that the laptop or its contents were his.
John Paul Mac Isaac, the owner of the computer repair shop where Hunter Biden allegedly left the laptop, has accused Hunter of falsely claiming that the laptop wasn’t his, was stolen, or had been hacked. In response, Hunter is countersuing Mac Isaac, alleging the illegal distribution of his personal data and an invasion of privacy.
The deposition revealed several points of contention:
Multiple Visits: Hunter refused to admit that he visited The Mac Shop twice in April 2019, despite evidence presented by Mac Isaac, including a work order with Hunter’s signature and contact information.
Ownership of the Laptop: Hunter did not acknowledge that the laptop was his, stating that he either didn’t recall or denied it altogether.
Embarrassing Content: Hunter claimed to be embarrassed by the content on the laptop, but the deposition noted that he had voluntarily shared explicit material on other platforms, such as Pornhub.
Consent to Access Data: Hunter refused to admit that he gave consent for Mac Isaac to access the data on the laptop, even though he had signed a work order.
Repair Authorization: Hunter referred to the Repair Authorization as a “typical small-print adhesion clause,” despite being a trained attorney and signing the document.
Mac Isaac’s legal team argued that Hunter’s responses in the deposition were “confused and dishonest” and failed to substantiate his counterclaims. They also noted that the FBI had verified the authenticity of the laptop, and an expert found it had not been manipulated. Furthermore, financial records indicated that Hunter was near the repair shop on the day the laptop was dropped off.
The defamation lawsuit and countersuit between Hunter Biden and John Paul Mac Isaac revolve around the ownership and contents of the laptop, as well as the alleged dissemination of personal data from it.