A federal judge has ruled that Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate and legal U.S. resident, can move forward with his lawsuit against the U.S. government, claiming his detention and looming deportation are politically motivated and violate his constitutional rights.
Khalil, known for his outspoken pro-Palestinian stance, was taken into custody by immigration authorities in March and has been held at a detention center in Louisiana. Government officials argue that his activism creates foreign policy concerns, particularly due to his participation in protests critical of U.S. support for Israel.
His legal team contends that the arrest was not about national security but a retaliatory act meant to suppress political dissent. The lawsuit claims Khalil’s First Amendment rights have been infringed upon and challenges the government’s justification for his removal.
The judge’s decision to hear the case has reignited debate over how far free speech protections extend for non-citizens residing in the U.S., especially in politically charged contexts. The outcome could set a precedent in determining the limits of constitutional safeguards for lawful residents who engage in controversial political expression.