A recent watchdog report has cast doubt on whether former President Joe Biden personally approved several major climate-related executive orders, raising concerns over the use of an autopen to authorize high-impact policy decisions.
The findings highlight at least eight key environmental directives—ranging from halting Arctic drilling to targeting net-zero emissions by 2050—that show no clear public record of Biden personally discussing or endorsing them before their issuance. This has prompted questions about whether the orders were signed mechanically without his direct oversight.
The group behind the report has formally requested investigations from multiple federal agencies and congressional committees, urging a closer look into who authorized these sweeping changes. The concern centers on the possibility that decisions with nationwide impact may have been executed without the full awareness of the sitting president.
Although the use of an autopen is legally allowed for official presidential documents, the scale and significance of these executive actions have reignited debate about transparency and accountability within the executive branch.
Calls for answers are growing, as lawmakers and the public demand clarity on how executive authority is exercised—especially when policies affect energy production, environmental regulations, and long-term national strategy.