The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador must be brought back to the United States, marking a significant legal decision in a case that raised serious questions about due process in immigration enforcement.
The man, a longtime Maryland resident with no criminal record, was deported last year despite having an ongoing legal claim for protection under U.S. immigration laws. His attorneys argued that government officials violated federal procedure by removing him before his case was fully adjudicated.
In a 6–3 decision, the Court determined that the deportation was unlawful and ordered federal authorities to facilitate his immediate return. Justices in the majority stated that the man’s rights under the Immigration and Nationality Act were clearly violated, and that the error undermined the integrity of the judicial review process.
The ruling is expected to set a precedent for how similar cases are handled, particularly those involving individuals with pending appeals or unresolved asylum or residency claims. Legal experts say the decision reinforces the principle that immigration authorities must follow established procedures, even when pursuing removals.
Since his deportation, the man has reportedly faced life-threatening conditions in El Salvador, where he had not lived since childhood. His legal team described his situation as dire, citing threats from local gangs and a lack of access to basic services. The Court’s decision now opens the door for him to resume his legal proceedings in the United States, where he had been seeking relief.
Immigrant advocacy groups hailed the ruling as a victory for fairness and constitutional protections, while critics argue it could lead to delays in enforcement and complicate border security efforts. Still, the Court emphasized that the case was not about broader immigration policy, but rather the government’s obligation to honor legal process.
Federal officials have not yet announced a timeline for the man’s return but confirmed they are working to comply with the Court’s directive. The Department of Homeland Security is expected to coordinate his travel back to the U.S. in the coming days.
The case adds to a growing list of legal challenges spotlighting the tension between immigration enforcement and due process, particularly in an environment of evolving policies and heightened scrutiny.