President Donald Trump has vowed to veto a newly proposed bipartisan bill that would require congressional approval before the executive branch could impose tariffs, asserting that such legislation would severely undermine presidential authority on trade matters.
The legislation, which has gained traction among lawmakers from both parties, aims to rein in unilateral tariff actions by mandating a formal review and vote by Congress before new tariffs can be enacted. Supporters of the bill argue it would restore balance to trade decision-making and ensure that major economic policies reflect broader legislative input.
Trump, however, rejected that premise, stating that the ability to swiftly impose tariffs is a vital tool in negotiating favorable trade agreements and protecting American industries. He warned that limiting executive power in this area would weaken the country’s global negotiating position and embolden foreign competitors.
In remarks to reporters, Trump defended the aggressive tariff strategy employed during his administration, crediting it with forcing key trade partners—particularly China and the European Union—to the bargaining table. He suggested that the bill was politically motivated and intended to slow his momentum ahead of ongoing trade negotiations.
White House officials confirmed that Trump is prepared to veto the measure if it reaches his desk, regardless of its bipartisan origins. The bill’s sponsors include lawmakers who have expressed concern that recent tariff decisions, while politically effective, have bypassed critical economic oversight and contributed to inflation and market instability.
The proposed legislation is still being debated in both chambers of Congress. While it has garnered significant support, it remains unclear whether there are enough votes to override a presidential veto.
As the debate continues, the issue has become a flashpoint in the broader discussion over executive power and economic policy, with advocates on both sides making their case for how trade tools should be deployed—and by whom.