Last year, the January 6 Committee, in defiance of a request from incoming Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), proceeded to destroy a substantial portion of its amassed records, evidence, and transcripts after over a year of investigation. This disclosure was made by Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) during an interview with Fox News Digital on Tuesday. Loudermilk also highlighted that the committee had neglected to delve into potential security breaches at the Capitol and noted that the preserved materials were in a state of disarray.
According to a report by Fox News, the House select committee, which had been tasked with probing the events of the January 6 Capitol riot, failed to adequately safeguard essential documents, data, and video testimonies, including correspondence with the Biden White House that remains missing. Rep. Barry Loudermilk, who oversees the GOP’s inquiry into the committee’s work, indicated that the Democrat-led “J6” committee, which included only two Republican members, did not furnish any evidence of investigating security shortcomings on the day of the riot. He further elucidated that the material that was preserved exhibited a lack of organization.
Loudermilk elaborated on the absence of proper indexing and digitization within the collected data, revealing that the investigation lacked a comprehensive database system, making the review process time-consuming and arduous. He highlighted that a designated team intended to examine security gaps (“Blue Team”) had been prematurely disbanded, potentially due to the committee’s focus on assigning blame to former President Donald Trump, who had been indicted for purportedly inciting the riot.
The House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, led by Rep. Benny Thompson (D-MS), was established by then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). Although the committee composition was meant to include both Democrats and Republicans, Pelosi rejected two Republican nominations, prompting McCarthy to withdraw all Republican nominees. This resulted in the committee being predominantly Democratic. Loudermilk alleged that this partisan composition influenced the committee’s actions.
The committee, supported by an extensive team of lawyers, undertook over 1,000 witness interviews in closed-door depositions, spending millions of dollars in the process. Testimonies were often given under oath, yet only a handful of witnesses testified publicly in scripted hearings. While videos and transcripts were generated, only a limited selection was shared with the public, raising concerns about potential manipulation of testimonies and the committee’s communication with the White House and the Department of Justice.
In response to these concerns, McCarthy and the House Administration Committee sought to ensure the preservation of all collected information. However, it came to light that the committee had not upheld this commitment fully, as certain materials categorized as “temporary” were not retained. Consequently, the committee failed to safeguard the raw evidence amassed during its comprehensive investigation.
Conservative commentator Mark Levin suggested that the destruction of records may have been an effort to obstruct future Republican inquiries into the committee’s work, hinder Trump’s defense in related criminal prosecutions, and prevent other witnesses from vindicating themselves. Loudermilk had been publicly accused by the committee of aiding the rioters, an accusation that was later debunked by Capitol Police footage.
Interestingly, Special Counsel Jack Smith is prosecuting Trump for alleged mishandling of government records during his tenure, despite Trump’s lack of document destruction. This is in contrast to the January 6 Committee’s actions. While Trump faces substantial potential prison sentences if convicted, no known Department of Justice investigation is targeting Thompson or the committee for their document destruction.