The State Department is disputing accusations from lawmakers that the administration’s draft peace proposal for the Russia–Ukraine war was essentially crafted to satisfy Moscow’s conditions. The controversy erupted after several senators said they were briefed that the document “was not the administration’s plan” and appeared to align closely with Russian preferences.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio firmly rejected that portrayal, insisting the plan was developed by the United States, though he acknowledged it incorporated feedback from both Ukraine and Russia as part of the negotiation process. He stressed that describing the document as a “Russian wish list” was inaccurate and misrepresented the administration’s intentions.
The disputed proposal is a 28-point framework that drew immediate criticism for suggesting limits on Ukraine’s military capabilities, restrictions on future NATO membership and a freeze on territorial disputes — elements that many viewed as overly accommodating to Moscow. The leak of the plan triggered pushback not only in Congress but also among Ukrainian officials and European partners who argued the draft gave Russia undue leverage.
The State Department said the document was only an early version meant to serve as a starting point for discussion and not a final agreement. Officials emphasized that U.S. support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and security remains unchanged.
Even with the clarification, the incident has heightened tensions within diplomatic circles and raised questions about unity among Western allies as preparations continue for upcoming negotiations in Geneva.