How many times were we told that CrowdStrike determined that Russia hacked the DNC emails? More than I care to remember but who told us that? The DNC, Obama administration and the Deep State. Without that, there would have been no Robert Mueller and the 13 angry Democrats. I have often said in the past that CrowdStrike may have lied about that fact to aid the Democrats who were paying them. I owe CrowdStrike an apology.
As it turns out, CrowdStrike did say it was a possibility but that there was no concrete proof of it. That is why Adam Schiff refused to allow the Russia transcripts to be released. or at least one of many reasons. It was just another lie from the left and covered up by career liar Adam Schiff.
Crowdstrike’s Shaun Henry testified before the House Intel Committee and he did not claim that Russia perpetrated the hack or that there was a hack at all. He said it’s possible they were hacked but there was no definitive proof of it. So, it could have been an inside job, possibly by Seth Rich.
More from Crowdstrike’s Shaun Henry: “There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left.” (https://t.co/1mQJBgBMbw) pic.twitter.com/7cmVN4RjSE
— Aaron Maté (@aaronjmate) May 8, 2020
Recall that the Mueller report, in recounting the alleged Russian theft of emails, added the qualifier that the GRU “officers *appear* to have stolen thousands of emails and attachments.” Perhaps they weren’t sure, because Crowdstrike wasn’t either. https://t.co/xyBIUdUS9J pic.twitter.com/eXgPtNSXAr
— Aaron Maté (@aaronjmate) May 8, 2020
Cyber expert Yaacov Apelbaum posted an incredible report with information basically proving that the DNC was not hacked by the Russians.
Apelbaum’s first argument is this –
According to the WaPo (using CrowdStrike, DOJ, and their other usual hush-hush government sources in the know), the attack was perpetrated by a Russian unit lead by Lieutenant Captain Nikolay Kozachek who allegedly crafted a malware called X-Agent and used it to get into the network and install keystroke loggers on several PCs. This allowed them to see what the employees were typing and take screenshots of the employees’ computer.
This is pretty detailed information, but if this was the case, then how did the DOJ learn all of these ‘details’ and use them in the indictments without the FBI ever forensically evaluating the DNC/HRC computers? And since when does the DOJ, an organization that only speaks the language of indictments use hearsay and 3rd parties like the British national Matt Tait (a former GCHQ collector and a connoisseur of all things related to Russian collusion), CrowdStrike, or any other evidence lacking chain of custody certification as a primary source for prosecution?
A second point by Apelbaum was –
… that three of the Russian GRU officers on the DOJ wanted list were allegedly working concurrently on multiple non-related projects like interfering with the 2016 United States elections (both HRC and DNC) while at the same time they were also allegedly hacking anti-doping agencies (Images 2-3).